| |
|
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
R (0-4) |
Wt |
R x Wt |
| Presentation Content (Team) |
Introduction |
No Introduction. |
|
Introduction was incomplete or missing pieces of title slide. |
|
Introduced group members and topic at start of presentation and had a title slide with project name, group name, and group member names. |
|
1 |
|
| Presentation Content (Team) |
Requirements/Analysis |
Did not describe the requirements and analysis process. |
|
Partially described the requirements and analysis process. |
|
Fully described the requirements and analysis process. |
|
4 |
|
| Presentation Content (Team) |
Design |
Did not discuss design options and how decision was made. |
|
Partially discussed design options and how decision was made. |
|
Fully discussed design options and how decision was made. |
|
4 |
|
| Presentation Content (Team) |
Demo of implementation |
Did not provided a demo of the functionality. |
|
Provided a demo of the functionality, with many errors. |
|
Provided a well-planned demo of the functionality, with few or no errors. |
|
4 |
|
| Presentation Content (Team) |
Testing |
Did not describe white box and black box tests. |
|
Partially described white box and black box tests. |
|
Fully described white box and black box tests. |
|
4 |
|
| Presentation Content (Team) |
Lessons Learned |
Did not discuss lessons learned about programming concepts or software process. |
|
Partially discussed lessons learned about programming concepts and/or software process. |
|
Fully discussed lessons learned about programming concepts and/or software process. |
|
4 |
|
| Presentation Content (Team) |
Accuracy |
Numerous serious errors. |
|
Quite a few minor errors. |
|
Very few or no errors. |
|
2 |
|
| Presentation Delivery (Team) |
Organization |
Presented information in no logical sequence. |
|
Presented information in somewhat logical sequence. |
|
Presented information in logical, interesting sequence. |
|
2 |
|
| Presentation Delivery (Team) |
Graphics |
Used superfluous or no graphics. |
|
Used graphics that moderately support presentation and/or are unreadable. |
|
Used attractive graphics that consistently support presentation and are readable. |
|
2 |
|
| Presentation Delivery (Team) |
Content Knowledge |
Demonstrated no command of knowledge learned in course. |
|
Demonstrated partial command of knowledge learned in course. |
|
Demonstrated full command of knowledge learned in course. |
|
4 |
|
| Presentation Delivery (Team) |
Presentation Length |
Did not present |
|
Finished the presentation in under 7 minutes or over 10 minutes. |
|
Finished the presentation between 7-10 minutes. |
|
3 |
|
| Individual Performance |
Business Casual Dress |
Did not dress appropriately in business casual |
|
|
|
Dressed appropriately in business casual |
|
1 |
|
| Individual Performance |
Eye Contact |
Made no eye contact with audience. |
|
Used moderate eye contact with some of audience. |
|
Used good eye contact with entire audience. |
|
1 |
|
| Individual Performance |
Rehearsed |
Presentation was not rehearsed |
|
Presentation was somewhat rehearsed. |
|
Presentation was well-rehearsed |
|
1 |
|
| Individual Performance |
Delivery |
Inaudible during presentation |
|
Presented moderately clear, somewhat animated. |
|
Presented very clear, dynamic. |
|
1 |
|
| Individual Performance |
Presentation Length |
Did not present |
|
Presented for under two minutes |
|
Presented for two minutes or longer. |
|
1 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Sum (S) |
X |
39 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum (M) [4 x S(Wt)] |
X |
X |
156 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage (100 x (S-Deductions)/M) |
X |
X |
|